Rabuka’s Silence: What Does It Mean for Fiji’s Constitution?

Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has adopted a notably cautious stance by refraining from media interactions following the recent failure to amend the 2013 Constitution. This decision comes on the heels of the government’s attempt to pass the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2025, which fell just one vote short of the necessary 75 percent majority in Parliament.

The failed vote saw 40 Members of Parliament supporting the amendment, while 14 opposed it, and one MP abstained. As the government needed 41 votes to advance the amendment, the outcome raises questions regarding Rabuka’s silence as he usually addresses the media after significant parliamentary events.

In light of this setback, the government plans to seek guidance from the Supreme Court next week concerning the amendment process. Rabuka’s decision to exit through the back of the Speaker’s Chamber and his unwillingness to answer questions from the media have drawn attention, with reporters highlighting their attempts to engage with him since the parliamentary vote.

Reflecting on the failed amendment attempt, it mirrors the challenges Rabuka has previously faced. He announced that his government is four votes shy of the three-quarter majority needed for constitutional amendments, echoing sentiments expressed during prior media briefings which emphasized the critical role of the Constitution in defining the state’s powers and protecting citizens’ rights.

Despite these obstacles, Rabuka remains hopeful for future engagement and inclusivity, recognizing the potential for constructive dialogue as a means to shape a constitutional framework that resonates with Fiji’s multi-ethnic and multicultural society. His commitment to fostering an environment where all communities feel represented is essential in navigating the complexities of constitutional reform.

The political landscape in Fiji continues to evolve. While the challenges are significant, the ongoing push for a more inclusive governance structure reflects a hopeful direction that prioritizes the voices and needs of all citizens. Such developments can pave the way for a stronger democratic framework that could unify the diverse population of Fiji in the long run.