Mosese Bulitavu, an opposition Member of Parliament, has accused former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum of engaging in political maneuvering to distract from issues surrounding recent parliamentary pay rises. Bulitavu asserted that Sayed-Khaiyum is adopting a false sense of morality by urging those who voted against the salary increases to donate their pay to charity.
Bulitavu highlighted the hypocrisy of Sayed-Khaiyum, given that he himself benefitted from higher salaries during his 16 years in office without donating his surplus earnings to charity. Reflecting on a recent parliamentary session, Bulitavu pointed out that the recently reviewed Annual Reports of the Attorney-General’s Office show a lack of accountability and updates, contrasting the pressure exerted on other ministers to present their reports.
He also criticized Sayed-Khaiyum’s handling of the Presidential Pension Act, which was amended to align the presidential term with the 2013 Constitution, claiming that Sayed-Khaiyum neglected this responsibility during his time as Attorney-General.
Additionally, Bulitavu cited alarming findings from a Walesi audit, disclosed by Deputy Prime Minister Manoa Kamikamica, indicating significant mismanagement of taxpayer funds. He pointed out that Sayed-Khaiyum, as the “super Minister” responsible for Communications, should be held accountable for these financial oversights.
The situation escalated with recent comments from Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo, who remarked on the legality of the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, receiving unauthorized superannuation payments. This, Bulitavu said, reflects poorly on Sayed-Khaiyum’s tenure as Attorney-General, during which these decisions were made.
Overall, Bulitavu’s statements emphasize a call for accountability and ethical governance in light of recent political developments, showcasing a greater demand for transparency from former leaders.
This ongoing political discourse highlights the importance of integrity and responsibility in public office, suggesting a potential shift towards greater scrutiny of past administrative actions. It encourages a hopeful focus on the future, where the public can advocate for improved practices and leadership accountability.
Leave a comment