Revelations from leaked documents related to the Commission of Inquiry (COI) into the appointment of FICAC Commissioner Barbara Malimali raise serious concerns about the integrity of the process. The documents allege that key government figures, including Solicitor-General Ropate Greene, Chief Registrar Tomasi Bainivalu, and Chief Justice Salesi Temo, were aware of complaints against Malimali when she was appointed, contradicting their public statements of ignorance.
The leaked reports assert that both Greene and Bainivalu had personal interests in facilitating Malimali’s appointment, suggesting that they hoped her leadership would protect their cases against complaints lodged by social media activist Alexandra Forwood, who had previously filed grievances against them with FICAC. This presents a clear conflict of interest, raising questions about the fairness of the appointment process, which the documents claim was rushed. According to the inquiry findings, the lack of proper investigation could have prevented controversial aspects of Malimali’s selection from coming to light.
Critics have pointed out that the appointment lacked integrity, fairness, and transparency, with only minimal scrutiny applied by the Judicial Services Commission. The damning nature of the findings led to calls for a reassessment of how FICAC operates and reinforces the demand for rigorous governance practices in Fiji.
Previous articles highlighted broader systemic issues within Fiji’s governance, suggesting that the political environment surrounding Malimali’s appointment had been marred by ethical compromises aimed at shielding high-ranking officials from accountability. The inquiry presents a unique opportunity for Fiji to critically address governance reforms, aiming to restore public trust in both political institutions and the rule of law.
With this challenging landscape, there remains a sense of hope that these revelations will foster significant changes to enhance ethical standards and accountability within Fiji’s political framework. Stakeholders anticipate that thorough scrutiny may lead to vital reforms, ensuring a culture of integrity is reestablished within public service.
Leave a comment