Fiji’s Constitution: A Stubborn Barrier to Change?

Fiji’s 2013 Constitution is considered one of the most challenging in the world to amend, according to Attorney-General Graham Leung. He emphasized that the requirements for changing the Constitution are particularly stringent, stating that achieving consensus among three-quarters of both Members of Parliament and registered voters is a monumental task. Leung likened this challenge to the difficulty of a camel passing through the eye of a needle, highlighting the complexity of obtaining such widespread agreement.

Mr. Leung acknowledged the increasing public interest in constitutional reform, expressing that the government is aware of the “appetite for change.” He indicated that it is now up to the government to decide how to approach the matter, especially considering the tight legislative schedule leading up to the 2026 general elections. The year 2025 is expected to be particularly busy in terms of law-making, prompting the government to carefully plan how to tackle constitutional revisions.

He outlined two potential strategies for moving forward: addressing more straightforward amendments or undertaking a comprehensive review of the Constitution. Additionally, Mr. Leung proposed that the government might consider seeking advice from the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of the Constitution’s amendment provisions. He suggested that if the amendment process is effectively unchangeable, this raises significant constitutional questions in itself.

This discussion underscores the ongoing dialogue regarding constitutional reform in Fiji and reflects a government that is responsive to public sentiment. While the challenges ahead are substantial, there is a clear willingness to engage in a thoughtful review of the Constitution, suggesting a possible path forward for meaningful change.

In summary, the current situation concerning Fiji’s Constitution reveals a government aware of public calls for reform, navigating complex legal frameworks as it seeks to balance legislative priorities ahead of the next election. This openness for dialogue and consideration of amendments could lead to a more adaptable and reflective governing document that resonates with the people it serves.