The Fiji National Rugby League (FNRL) has officially asserted that Apenisa Dansey is the recognized Chairman of the organization. In a recent statement, FNRL affirmed that Dansey’s appointment is fully endorsed and that he is the only person authorized to represent the governing body.
The league emphasized that all official interactions, including agreements, endorsements, and communications pertaining to FNRL, must receive direct approval from Dansey and should be relayed through the league’s official communication channels. FNRL issued a warning to stakeholders, stating that any third-party endeavors, claims, or negotiations held without Dansey’s explicit authorization would be deemed invalid and not acknowledged by the organization.
This announcement follows the dismissal of former assistant chairman Rajesh Singh, who was removed last week due to failure to comply with governance requirements. Singh’s appointment to the FNRL Board during the 2024 Annual General Meeting raised conflicts as he did not formally resign from his position with the NRL Bid, contrary to the guidelines set to prevent potential conflicts of interest.
Singh’s failure to submit a resignation led to breaches of compliance protocols, prompting Chairman Dansey to take necessary actions in the best interest of the FNRL. However, Singh has contended that his position on the board has not been lawfully terminated.
In his response to the board, Singh pointed out that a letter dated February 20, 2026, which claimed to terminate his role under Article 49(a) of the FNRL constitution, misapplies the provision. He asserts that the provision only pertains to directors holding an “office of profit” under the company without consent from the league in a general meeting. Singh maintains he has never held such an office and argues that the required conditions for this provision do not exist.
Furthermore, Singh indicated that the removal of a director is governed by Articles 58 and 59 of the constitution, necessitating special notice and ordinary resolutions at a general meeting—processes he argues have not been followed. He continues to claim his role as a valid director of the FNRL and insists that he remains in the position of chairman, calling for all directors to adhere to the constitution and act in the league’s best interest.
The ongoing developments underline a critical period for FNRL, highlighting the importance of governance and compliance within the organization. This situation could lead to a reevaluation of governance practices, ultimately benefiting the integrity of the league moving forward.
Leave a comment