The results of the Tribunal concerning the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, will soon be disclosed to the public, but only after President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu has thoroughly reviewed the report, conducted necessary consultations, and obtained advice. The President’s Office has indicated that this timeline may extend, as several officials are currently on leave for the Christmas and New Year holidays.
The report was submitted to the President on December 23, 2024. In a recent letter, Mr. Pryde requested that the findings be made public, invoking Section 112 (6) of the Constitution which mandates the public release of such reports. He was suspended with full pay on April 13, 2023, amid allegations of misbehavior after being observed with former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum. The suspension process is governed by Chapter 5, Part A, Section 112 of the Fiji Constitution.
A three-member Tribunal was formed to investigate the allegations, led by Justice Anare Tuilevuka, along with Justices Chaitanya Lakshman and Samuela Qica. In his correspondence to the President’s office, Pryde highlighted the constitutional provisions that require the President to act based on the Tribunal’s advice. He emphasized that if the report finds insufficient evidence to support the allegations, his suspension should be lifted, and he should be reinstated to his former position.
Mr. Pryde voiced the urgency of resolving this matter, as he has faced considerable financial strain since his suspension began nearly 21 months ago, with almost six months without salary. Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka declined to comment on the situation, stating it was not within his purview. Responses from the Minister for Justice Siromi Turaga and Attorney-General Graham Leung are still awaited.
The President’s Office confirmed the commitment to making the report public while acknowledging the need for due process in reviewing the findings once all officials return from leave in the New Year.
This situation reflects a critical moment for both Mr. Pryde and the governance of public prosecution in Fiji, as it showcases the importance of due process and transparency within the judicial system. As the year comes to a close, there is hope that a timely resolution can bring peace of mind to both Mr. Pryde and those concerned about the integrity and functioning of the justice system in the country. The outcome may also set a precedent for handling similar cases in the future, fostering confidence in democratic processes and accountability.
Leave a comment