The Fiji Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission (FHRADC) experienced significant “reputational damage” following the 2006 coup, as it was perceived that the commissioners were aligned with the appointing authority. Pravesh Sharma, the chairperson of the FHRADC, explained in an interview that the commission is currently working to advertise the commissioner positions to ensure that appointments are based on merit rather than favoritism.
Sharma emphasized the need for a transparent selection process, which would help the commission meet its obligations to the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) based in Geneva. He noted that the commission’s credibility was seriously undermined after the coup, leading to a loss of its A-accreditation status in 2006, which signifies full compliance with human rights principles. As a result of these issues, the commission was left without any accreditation for a significant period, which hindered its ability to operate effectively.
Mr. Sharma stated that the FHRADC had previously held an A-status from 2003 to 2007, the highest rating achievable. However, after the coup, an evaluation indicated that the commission had failed to uphold human rights principles adequately, leading to the suspension of its operations by GANHRI. This situation highlights the challenges the FHRADC has faced in restoring its reputation and credibility over the years.
Moving forward, there is optimism that by adopting a merit-based appointment process, the FHRADC can rebuild its standing and enhance its effectiveness in promoting and protecting human rights in Fiji.
Given this context, it’s crucial to recognize the importance of a transparent and accountable appointment process in strengthening the integrity of human rights institutions. By taking these steps, the FHRADC aims to not only regain its previous status but also to foster public confidence in its commitment to human rights.
Leave a comment