Fiji’s Constitutional Dilemma: Can History Shape the Future?

In a recent address, Inia Seruiratu, the Leader of the Opposition in Fiji, underscored the urgent need to consider the nation’s unique historical context when discussing potential reforms to the constitution. He raised concerns about the 2013 Constitution, which has been widely criticized for not accurately representing the wishes of the Fijian people.

Seruiratu pointed out that Fiji’s history, characterized by multiple coups and significant political upheaval, creates a context that is distinct from other democracies. He noted that previous constitutions from 1970, 1990, and 1997 were unable to fulfill their intended goals due to ongoing national challenges. “Let’s not forget our history,” he cautioned, emphasizing the importance of understanding these complexities before proceeding with reforms.

He voiced apprehension regarding the current government’s efforts to swiftly amend the constitution, advocating for a measured and inclusive approach. He insisted that any changes should reflect the voices of all Fijians. “The government may have the numbers, Mister Speaker, but that doesn’t mean we should ride roughshod over the process we need to follow,” he remarked, calling for transparent dialogue that encompasses diverse perspectives from various sectors of society.

Seruiratu has previously called for a national conversation to address the events of 1987, 2000, and 2006, which he believes are essential in reconciling past issues that continue to shape the nation’s political landscape. He advocates for constitutions to be recognized as “living documents” that must adapt to the evolving needs of the nation—a viewpoint shared by other political figures, such as Minister for Lands and Mineral Resources, Filimoni Vosarogo, who also highlighted the necessity of a constitution that genuinely reflects the will of the people.

This ongoing discourse presents a constructive opportunity for Fiji to enhance its governance framework, fostering a constitutional structure that genuinely embodies the diverse aspirations of its citizens. By prioritizing inclusive dialogue and acknowledging historical context, there is optimism for a more unified and representative democracy that can bolster stability within the nation.