Fiji’s Parliament is currently embroiled in a significant debate surrounding the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, with Opposition MP Faiz Koya raising strong objections to the motion to suspend certain Standing Orders. During a parliamentary session, Koya argued that the suspension constitutes a breach of both the Constitution and the Standing Orders, stressing that constitutional amendments should be approached with care and according to established protocols.
Koya highlighted that the Constitution is amendable but must follow proper procedures, specifically the requirement for a referendum should any amendments be approved by 75% of Parliament. He emphasized the importance of respecting the Constitution, noting that since Fiji’s independence, there have been four constitutions, each requiring a specific threshold of approval for changes. “We currently do not even know what the amendments will be,” he said, pointing to the uncertainty surrounding the government’s proposed changes.
In contrast, the government, led by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, initiated this reform effort to address perceived undemocratic elements within the 2013 Constitution. The motion to suspend Standing Orders aims to streamline the legislative process, facilitating discussions on amendments deemed necessary by the government. However, this has sparked significant criticism from opposition members, including Koya, who argue that such a move threatens the constitutional framework.
Despite the opposition’s contention, the House proceeded to pass the motion, allowing the government to advance with the Bill. This parliamentary decision has sparked a larger conversation about inclusivity and the need for a governance structure that accurately reflects the voices and rights of all Fijians.
Previous discussions indicated a growing sentiment for reform among various political factions, with some independent MPs expressing their conditional support for constitutional changes. The need for amendments stems from a desire to enhance citizen engagement and rectify power imbalances perceived in previous governmental structures.
As the debate unfolds, there remains a hopeful prospect for meaningful change that could lead to a governance model better aligned with the democratic ideals and aspirations of the Fijian population. With ongoing dialogue and collaboration, there is potential for a constitutional framework that fosters unity and inclusivity, ensuring that the voices of all Fijians are represented in the governance process.
Leave a comment