Attorney-General Graham Leung has emphasized the urgent need for reforms to the 2013 Constitution, advocating for an evolution that aligns with the needs and aspirations of the Fijian people. During discussions surrounding the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2025 in Parliament, Leung highlighted the challenges posed by the current amendment process. It requires a supermajority of 75% approval from both Parliament and registered voters in a referendum, making it one of the most difficult constitutions globally to amend. This high threshold, he argues, undermines the principle of popular sovereignty.
Leung noted that the rigidity of the Constitution has historically hindered necessary changes, contributing to political instability in Fiji, particularly during past coups in 1987, 2000, and 2006. He criticized the existing constitutional framework for focusing more on maintaining control than empowering citizens to instigate change that reflects their evolving needs.
Looking ahead, Leung disclosed that 2025 is a crucial year, leading into general elections expected in 2026. The government is exploring various strategies for possible constitutional amendments, including phased or incremental changes that prioritize manageable adjustments before addressing more substantial reforms.
He stressed the importance of careful consideration and collaboration in any amendment process, underscoring the need for discussions that include political entities and civil society, to build widespread support. He acknowledged the difficulties of achieving consensus as highlighted by scholars, including Professor Anthony Reagan.
This ongoing dialogue suggests a renewed commitment to a governance model that is responsive to the populace. By promoting inclusive public discussions surrounding constitutional reform, there is a hopeful prospect for the government to better align the Constitution with the citizens’ aspirations, thereby enhancing democracy in Fiji. The focus on cooperation and the acknowledgment of diverse perspectives encapsulate a positive potential for meaningful alterations within the nation’s legal structure.
Leave a comment