The High Court in Suva has granted additional time to finalize its judgment in the ongoing trial of former attorney-general Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum and former supervisor of elections Mohammed Saneem, postponing the decision to March 30. Justice Salesi Temo expressed the need for careful consideration of the complex issues and final submissions made during the trial before reaching a conclusion.
Mr. Sayed-Khaiyum faces a charge of abuse of office, while Mr. Saneem is charged with receiving a corrupt benefit. These charges stem from the approval and acceptance of a tax relief arrangement exceeding $50,000 during Mr. Saneem’s time as supervisor of elections. The State claims that the tax benefit was granted without necessary constitutional approvals, indicating that established procedures were overlooked.
In defense of the accused, their legal representatives have asserted that the arrangement was legitimate and constituted part of their contractual employment entitlements. This high-profile case has drawn considerable public interest due to the significant roles both individuals have held and the constitutional implications discussed in court.
Currently, both Mr. Sayed-Khaiyum and Mr. Saneem remain on bail as they await the court’s ruling, highlighting the ongoing attention this trial has garnered in the legal community and among the public. As the judiciary takes the necessary time to deliberate on this case, there is hope for a thorough examination of the facts before a final judgment is rendered, reflecting the principles of justice and due process.
Leave a comment