The debate over proposed amendments to Fiji’s 2013 Constitution is intensifying in Parliament, with significant input from various lawmakers. MP Sachida Nand has defended his vote in favor of these amendments against allegations of opportunism, asserting that his motivations were rooted in principle rather than personal gain. He reminded fellow legislators of their past abstentions on matters such as the Remuneration Bill, where some have benefited while not supporting the vote.
Nand emphasized the necessity of a more inclusive constitutional process, arguing that the existing Constitution was adopted with minimal public engagement, allowing only two weeks for citizen feedback, which he believes is inadequate. He pointed out that Fiji has experienced four constitutional iterations since gaining independence in 1970, each reflecting the nation’s changing values and political dynamics.
In garnering support for the amendments, Nand expressed concerns about the challenging requirements for any constitutional changes, particularly the need for a 75 percent majority in Parliament and a national referendum, which he considers an overly burdensome obstacle given historical voter turnout patterns in Fiji. He advocated for a procedural overhaul that would enhance public participation in governance.
Minister Sakiasi Ditoka supported these views, criticizing the amendment process as undemocratic and arguing that the high threshold disproportionately benefits a minority of voters, thus undermining genuine democratic representation. He called for reforms to simplify the amendment process so that it better reflects the will of the larger population.
Government MP Lynda Tabuya also raised her concerns about the current process, linking it to the undemocratic origins of the 2013 Constitution that followed military rule. She proposed replacing the referendum with a thorough Constitutional review process to improve public consultation.
As discussions in Parliament continue, there is optimism that these dialogues may lead to democratic reforms genuinely representing the hopes of all Fijians. This collective move towards a more representative governance structure emphasizes the importance of civic engagement and public representation in constitutional matters.
The current constitutional debate presents a chance for positive change, inviting citizens to collaborate in reshaping governance in a manner that reflects Fiji’s diverse society. Lawmakers play a pivotal role in ensuring that the Constitution evolves to meet the needs and rights of its people, promoting unity and participation rather than division. The commitment to review and possibly reform the Constitution is a promising signal of an adaptive political environment responsive to its citizens’ voices.
Leave a comment