The United States has officially withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), marking the conclusion of a contentious process that began with criticism of the agency’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Announced by the US Health and State Departments, this decision stems from allegations made by the Trump administration regarding the WHO’s management practices during the health crisis.

President Donald Trump initiated the withdrawal process on his first day in office in January 2021. As a result of this departure, the US will reduce its cooperation with the WHO and instead collaborate directly with other nations on issues such as disease surveillance and public health initiatives.

Legally, the US was required to provide a year’s notice and settle an estimated $260 million in outstanding dues. However, a State Department official indicated that the payment was not a necessary condition for the withdrawal, asserting that “the American people have paid more than enough.”

Historically, the US was the largest contributor to the WHO, funding approximately 18 percent of its budget. The withdrawal has created significant financial challenges for the organization, leading to a reduction of its management team by half and a workforce cut of a quarter, actions that are likely to hinder global health initiatives.

Health experts have raised concerns over the potential negative impact of the US exit on international capabilities to identify and respond to health threats. Kelly Henning, who oversees public health initiatives at Bloomberg Philanthropies, emphasized that this move could weaken critical systems and international collaborations crucial for global health security.

As the landscape of global health continues to evolve, the ramifications of this withdrawal from the WHO may serve as a pivotal moment for international health cooperation.


Discover more from FijiGlobalNews

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Comments

One response to “US Withdraws from WHO: What Comes Next for Global Health”

  1. Martin Veikune Avatar
    Martin Veikune

    In my humble view, the United States’ withdrawal from the World Health Organization can be understood as a cautious reassessment rather than a rejection of global health cooperation. Given the U.S.’s long-standing role as the largest contributor, providing roughly 18 percent of the WHO’s budget, it is reasonable to question whether funding levels were matched by sufficient accountability and operational effectiveness, particularly during the COVID-19 response. The decision appears aimed at preserving flexibility and directing resources toward bilateral partnerships, regional initiatives, and domestic public health capabilities, while still engaging internationally through alternative channels. Seen this way, the withdrawal reflects an effort to balance responsibility with realism, rather than an intent to disengage from global health altogether.

Leave a comment

Latest News

Discover more from FijiGlobalNews

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading