The investigation into Barbara Malimali’s appointment as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) has sparked significant dialogue regarding potential governmental interference in the selection process. Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has publicly stated that he will not engage in discussions relating to Malimali’s possible dismissal, stressing that such matters are under the jurisdiction of the Judicial Services Commission.
Rabuka has underscored the necessity of adhering to appropriate protocols during the inquiry, which aims to assess whether the appointment process upheld standards of integrity, fairness, and transparency. His stance includes a dedication to uncovering any abuses of authority while ensuring that the findings of the investigation remain independent and uninfluenced by external pressures.
The Commission of Inquiry tasked with this investigation will thoroughly examine the legality and ethical conduct involved in Malimali’s selection. Of particular interest is the context surrounding her appointment, especially since she was previously under investigation by FICAC during her tenure as chairperson of the Electoral Commission.
Previous revelations have raised serious concerns about the timing of Malimali’s selection, which coincided with corruption allegations against Deputy Prime Minister Biman Prasad. Former Acting Deputy Commissioner of FICAC, Francis Pulewai, noted that a notification regarding these charges was sent to both Rabuka and Justice Minister Siromi Turaga just before Malimali’s appointment. Notably, the charges against Prasad have since been suspended since she took on her role at FICAC.
In reaction to the heightened scrutiny over public officials, Rabuka has endorsed a proposed new Code of Conduct for public officeholders put forth by President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu. This initiative is aimed at fortifying ethical standards and ensuring accountability throughout the public sector.
As the petition calling for Malimali’s removal gains momentum, concerns regarding her appointment continue to escalate. The investigation into her selection process is being viewed as a pivotal opportunity to restore public confidence in Fiji’s governance, potentially ushering in stronger commitments to transparency and integrity in public office.
This situation signifies a crucial juncture for Fiji, where the pursuit of ethical governance could lead to positive reforms within its political environment. There remains hope that these developments will foster a more transparent and accountable public sector, ultimately benefitting the nation as a whole.
Leave a comment