Debate surrounding the proposed amendments to the 2013 Constitution has gained traction in Fiji’s Parliament, with significant interventions from various lawmakers. Member of Parliament Sachida Nand defended his recent vote in favor of these amendments after facing criticism of being opportunistic. Nand emphasized that his actions were principled rather than self-serving, and he reminded colleagues of previous abstentions on issues like the Remuneration Bill, where some politicians took advantage of the benefits despite not voting in favor.
Nand highlighted the need for a more inclusive and transparent constitutional framework, arguing that the current Constitution was created by a select few without adequate public input—it allowed only two weeks for citizen feedback, which he deemed insufficient. He pointed out that Fiji has had four Constitutions since its independence in 1970, each shaped by the country’s evolving values and political landscapes.
Gaining support for the amendments, Nand raised concerns about the stringent requirements for constitutional change, notably the necessity of a 75 percent majority in Parliament and a national referendum. He labeled this as a nearly impossible barrier, given historical voter turnout in Fiji, and called for a process that would foster greater public involvement in governance.
Minister Sakiasi Ditoka echoed these sentiments, criticizing the amendment process as undemocratic. He insisted that the high threshold undermines democratic representation, disproportionately empowering a minority of voters. Ditoka advocated for reforms to make the amendment process more attainable and reflective of the broader populace’s will.
Government MP Lynda Tabuya also voiced her concerns, opposing the current process and linking it to the undemocratic methods that characterized the imposition of the 2013 Constitution after military rule. She suggested replacing the referendum requirement with a comprehensive Constitutional review process which could enhance public consultation.
As the parliamentary discussion progresses, there remains hope that the ongoing dialogues could pave the way for democratic reforms that genuinely reflect the aspirations of all Fijians. This drive for a more representative and inclusive governance structure resonates with the clarity of need for civic engagement and community representation in constitutional affairs.
Such developments highlight the crucial role of lawmakers in ensuring that Fiji’s Constitution evolves to meet the needs and rights of its citizens, fostering a governance model marked by unity and participation rather than division. The collective commitment to review and potentially reform the Constitution serves as a positive indication of a political landscape responsive to the voice of the people.
This ongoing constitutional debate is an opportunity for progress, calling for an engaged citizenry working together to reshape governance in a way that reflects the diverse tapestry of Fiji.
Leave a comment