The Fiji Law Society has formally urged Janet Mason, who serves as the counsel assisting the Commission of Inquiry (COI) into Barbara Malimali’s appointment as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), to step aside. This recommendation arises from concerns that her continued involvement may diminish public confidence in the integrity of the inquiry. The Society clarified, however, that it is not advocating for Mason’s outright removal but suggests that it is prudent for her to refrain from participation until the issues pertaining to her professional conduct are resolved.
The recommendation is in light of a misconduct finding against Mason by the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal, a decision that she is currently appealing. Additionally, serious allegations regarding her application for a practicing certificate in Fiji have raised significant questions about how her case has been handled by the Legal Practitioners Unit.
The Fiji Law Society emphasized the necessity of maintaining high standards of integrity and professionalism among all participants in the inquiry. They highlight that the COI is critically examining the legality and propriety of Malimali’s appointment, underscoring the importance of public trust in both Mason and the Commissioner.
Mason has publicly expressed her concerns regarding the actions of the Fiji Law Society, alleging that they are attempting to undermine her position. She has filed a police report about alleged document tampering related to her application for a practicing certificate, firmly defending her qualifications and integrity.
As the inquiry progresses, there is a sense of optimism that it could lead to significant reforms within Fiji’s governance framework. This situation presents not only a challenge but also an opportunity to enhance ethical governance practices, accountability, and transparency in Fiji’s political and legal systems. Many stakeholders hope that the findings of the COI will not only clarify the specific allegations surrounding Malimali’s appointment but will also promote a culture of ethical conduct that restores public faith in governmental operations.
In summary, while challenges remain in resolving the issues surrounding Janet Mason’s role in the inquiry, there exists a hopeful prospect for positive change in Fiji’s governance landscape. The ongoing inquiry represents a critical moment for accountability and integrity, with the potential to foster significant reforms within Fiji’s institutions.
Leave a comment