By Pita Ligaiula in Manila, Philippines
During the ongoing WCPFC22 session in Manila, French Pacific territories are voicing strong opposition to proposed measures that they argue could severely harm their domestic albacore fisheries and violate obligations aimed at protecting Small Island Developing States (SIDS). The delegation from French Polynesia led the charge, stating that their communities would be unable to manage the economic impact of one particular proposal pertaining to harvest control rules.
“Our fleets operate exclusively within our Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and South Pacific albacore is critical not just for fisheries, but for an entire value chain. Thousands of households rely on jobs related to vessel maintenance, shipbuilding, and fish product distribution, all of which are crucial to our local economy,” the French Polynesian delegation emphasized.
Citing Article 5 of the Convention, they warned that measures destabilizing their vulnerable economic balance would not comply with the Convention’s requirements. They expressed concern about RCO 10, a proposed Harvest Control Rule (HCR), stating that it would undermine the viability of their domestic albacore fishery, economy, and livelihoods, leading them to reject its consideration.
France expressed its support for its territories, highlighting the importance of the South Pacific albacore stock to the three Pacific collectivities. The French delegation backed a management plan based on long-term capacity, favoring either HCR 13 or HCR 7, with New Caledonia advocating for HCR 7 as a viable compromise for all parties involved.
The Commission Chair confirmed the scientific foundation of the proposed measures, stating that introducing a new option mid-negotiation would be unwise. They noted that the current work has provided three main management procedures without the possibility of a hybrid solution, reinforcing the unity of delegations that support adopting HCR 7.
New Caledonia supported the scientific groundwork already laid out, underscoring that the time for further estimations has passed. They echoed concerns that adopting HCR 10 could impose an undue burden on SIDS and participating territories given the complexities outlined in Article 13.
As discussions continue, the pressure on WCPFC22 is intensifying to make decisions that will both safeguard the stock of South Pacific albacore and ensure the sustainability of the communities dependent on these fisheries. The outcome of these negotiations is critical, as it will set the course for the future of fisheries management in the region, balancing ecological integrity with economic stability. There is hope that a consensus can be reached that benefits both the marine environment and the livelihoods of those who rely on it.
Leave a comment