Last week, Professor Vijay Naidu raised critical concerns regarding the leadership at the University of the South Pacific (USP) in a letter to the editor published in The Fiji Times. He expressed a hopeful vision for the university’s future, advocating for the appointment of a new Vice Chancellor to initiate necessary changes for improvement.
In his letter, Naidu condemned the recent dismissal of Dr. Osborne-Naikatini, arguing that this incident exemplified Vice Chancellor Professor Pal Ahluwalia’s mismanagement and overreach. He stressed that the challenges faced by USP are not merely surface-level; instead, they are deep-rooted, calling for a comprehensive reform that involves not just senior management but also the currently complacent senior academic faculty who used to be more actively engaged in the institution’s legacy.
Naidu pointed out several systemic issues hindering USP’s ability to offer quality education, such as a lack of accountability within the USP Council, insufficient engagement with stakeholders, and a failure to uphold academic freedom. He noted a troubling absence of pressure from stakeholders, including parents of private students who pay tuition fees, to address these issues.
He raised various ongoing problems, including the sidelining of senior academic voices, diminishing faculty and staff associations, and a historical pattern of political interference in USP’s governance, which have all compounded its challenges. Naidu highlighted that similar criticisms of the university’s leadership have been voiced over the years, referencing various articles he authored that detail these enduring issues.
Despite the daunting circumstances, there remains a sense of optimism within the academic community. Many believe that with increased accountability and better engagement from all stakeholders, USP can redefine its future and reaffirm its commitment to being a leading educational institution in the Pacific.
The situation at USP reflects wider concerns faced by universities globally regarding governance and leadership accountability. There is a call for stakeholders, including alumni and current students, to engage in collaborative dialogue aimed at fostering meaningful reforms. Such efforts have the potential to restore the university’s prestige and commitment to providing quality education throughout the Pacific region.
Overall, the article suggests a hopeful pathway for USP through collaboration and reform, indicating that change is possible with collective action and accountability.
Leave a comment