Internal communications reviewed by ABC News indicate that the Trump administration is moving forward with implementing a 90-day freeze on nearly all U.S. foreign aid, as mandated by an executive order. This decision has raised alarms among humanitarian organizations concerned about the potential consequences for aid programs globally.
In remarks made during a recent House Republicans’ retreat, President Donald Trump expressed his frustration with providing aid to nations that harbor anti-U.S. sentiments. “We get tired of giving massive amounts of money to countries that hate us, don’t we?” he stated.
A memo sent to USAID staff confirmed that the agency is under strict orders to comply with this executive directive. Ken Jackson, an assistant administrator at USAID, emphasized the need for thorough scrutiny of all programs, indicating that it will be challenging to obtain waivers for continued funding during this review period. Exceptions will reportedly apply only to emergency humanitarian situations involving food aid and specific travel for government officials.
Following the memo, approximately 60 senior USAID officials were placed on leave, including many legal advisors. Jason Gray, the acting administrator of USAID, accused the agency of circumventing the president’s orders, although no details about these alleged violations were provided.
In the State Department, staff overseeing existing projects funded through grants were directed to issue “stop-work orders” unless exceptions apply. This broad halt in foreign assistance has ignited significant worry within the international aid community, as it threatens vital programs that provide essential services, such as clean water access, education, and medical support, particularly in countries where U.S. interests are at stake, like Taiwan and Syria.
Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam, noted the existential threat this funding suspension poses to millions worldwide and urged an urgent reversal of this decision. “This decision must be reversed,” she pleaded, emphasizing that funding and programming should be reinstated to avoid a humanitarian crisis.
Critics of the aid freeze argue that the dissent from within the aid community is being stifled due to fears of retaliation. A new policy implemented by USAID now requires all external communications to be pre-approved, further underscoring an environment of caution among officials.
This situation reflects a critical moment for U.S. foreign policy and humanitarian efforts, raising concerns about the impact on global stability and support for vulnerable populations.
In summary, the decision to pause foreign aid signifies a shift in U.S. diplomatic strategy that may reverberate through international systems of support and humanitarian assistance, while highlighting the pressing need for clear communication and planning among aid organizations. As humanitarian groups advocate for a return to aid support, there remains hope that the administration will prioritize collaboration and reinstate necessary funding to continue lifesaving work worldwide.
Leave a comment