Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo has raised concerns regarding the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, following his lengthy conversation with former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum. Temo highlighted that this interaction, which lasted more than 45 minutes, was ill-advised, particularly because Sayed-Khaiyum is viewed as a controversial figure. He urged Pryde, as the Chief Prosecutor under the previous administration, to remain impartial and adhere strictly to his professional responsibilities.
During the testimony, Temo pointed out that the period after the formation of the Coalition Government was marked by significant distrust between the former and current administrations. He recalled statements made by the Prime Minister about the necessity for senior public officials to resign if they could not align with the new government’s directives. Temo emphasized that Pryde should have focused on his duties within the legal framework rather than engaging in discussions that could be seen as compromising.
While answering inquiries from the court regarding the content of Pryde and Sayed-Khaiyum’s dialogue, Temo confirmed there were no records of their exchange. However, he maintained that the visual evidence provided was telling and suggested a serious conversation had taken place.
The court also explored whether any established guidelines exist for addressing complaints like this. Temo responded that there are no specific protocols, but judicial officers are expected to uphold ethical standards, avoid conflicts of interest, and adhere to the constitutional oath in both courtroom and outside interactions.
Due to the differing accounts between the Attorney-General, as the complainant, and the Director of Public Prosecutions, Temo felt compelled to recommend the establishment of a tribunal. He indicated that failing to address the issue could lead to growing distrust between the government and the DPP, ultimately causing significant problems.
The tribunal is now examining allegations of misconduct against Pryde, who, on February 28, 2023, was observed conversing with Sayed-Khaiyum while the Criminal Investigation Department was under scrutiny regarding him. Furthermore, it has come to light that Pryde has been receiving US$1,000 per month in superannuation without the necessary approvals from relevant authorities.
As the trial proceeds, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact the future of both Pryde and the relationship between the judicial and governmental branches.
In a positive light, this situation underscores the commitment towards accountability and transparency within the government and judicial systems, as both are striving to address concerns that affect public trust. The establishment of a tribunal may lead to a clearer understanding of the boundaries and ethical obligations of public officials, fostering a stronger framework for governance.
Leave a comment