Former national squash representative Justin Ho is asserting that he is facing unfair treatment as he stands trial on 12 counts of drug trafficking. His application for Justice Aruna Aluthge to recuse herself from the case was discussed in the High Court in Lautoka, where his defense attorney, Iqbal Khan, presented 80 different grounds for the recusal. Mr. Khan argued that Justice Aluthge has shown bias by being overly lenient towards the prosecution, particularly regarding the conditions of Mr. Ho’s bail.
In his arguments, Khan noted the discrepancies in bail requirements between Mr. Ho and other defendants, highlighting that Ho was ordered to pay a cash bail of $15,000, whereas others were granted bail bonds. He also raised concerns about a curfew imposed on Ho without the state’s request, suggesting that this was another instance of unfair treatment. Furthermore, Khan pointed out that the trial date was shifted to accommodate state lawyers attending the Hong Kong Sevens, which he deemed inappropriate.
Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions John Rabuku countered these claims, accusing Ho and Khan of manipulating the situation and emphasizing that the charges against Ho positioned him as a significant figure in the drug trafficking allegations.
A decision regarding the application for recusal will be issued on April 15. This ongoing situation highlights significant issues surrounding judicial fairness and the complexities inherent in high-stakes criminal proceedings.
The developments in this case reflect the judiciary’s commitment to uphold legal standards while ensuring that all parties receive a fair hearing. The upcoming rulings have the potential to restore faith in the legal process and ascertain justice for those involved.
Leave a comment