Constitutional lawyer Jon Apted expressed his views at the Attorney-General’s Conference held at the Sheraton Fiji Resort and Spa in Nadi, emphasizing the challenges of reverting to the 1997 constitution. He argued that the complexities involved, such as reshaping the roles of Parliament, Senate, and judiciary, make such a transition impractical. According to Mr. Apted, numerous factors, including political changes and judicial interpretations, contribute to this complexity, suggesting that it may be too late to restore the previous constitutional framework.
Highlighting a shift in Fiji’s political dynamics, Mr. Apted noted that the disappearance of the FijiFirst party has opened up discussions among remaining MPs about the potential for constitutional change. He identified this period as a “unique moment for change,” where the political landscape appears more conducive to reform.
Moreover, he pointed out a recent Supreme Court ruling that reflects a judiciary that is open to innovative interpretations, which could facilitate discussions on constitutional amendments. While multiple reform proposals are on the table, including the possibility of a referendum, he stressed the importance of clearly defining the questions and parameters surrounding these proposals before any concrete steps are taken.
The conversation about constitutional reform in Fiji is growing, indicating a collective interest in re-evaluating governance structures and exploring new avenues for political development.
In summary, Jon Apted’s insights deliver both a realistic perspective on the impracticality of reverting to the past and a hopeful note on the potential for political reform in Fiji. The willingness to consider change and adapt to new circumstances can pave the way for a more representative and effective governance system. This scenario encourages citizens to engage in the democratic process as the country explores options for its constitutional future.
Leave a comment