The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for Fiji, Christopher Pryde, has expressed his concerns regarding his continued absence from office, attributing the delay to the Judicial Services Commission’s (JSC) failure to resolve new complaints lodged against him. Despite being cleared and reinstated by a presidential order three months ago, Pryde has not resumed his duties.
In a recent statement, he countered a Fiji Sun article titled “Paid to Do Nothing,” which questioned his prolonged stay in New Zealand at taxpayers’ expense. Pryde, who earns an annual salary of $250,000 plus benefits, emphasized that the JSC’s inaction has impeded his return. He indicated that he has been prepared to resume his role but fears another suspension without assurances from the JSC.
Pryde’s ordeal began when he was suspended in April 2023 amidst previous allegations but was reinstated by President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu earlier in January 2025 after a tribunal cleared him of those allegations. Yet, shortly after his reinstatement, Acting DPP Nancy Tikoisuva lodged fresh complaints, further complicating his situation.
The JSC has acknowledged Pryde’s letters refuting the new allegations, yet he has received no substantive replies, creating a sense of frustration. He addressed high-ranking officials, including the Attorney-General and Prime Minister, regarding this impasse, but none have provided feedback.
Pryde emphasized that without clarifications from the JSC, returning to Fiji poses risks, as he could face a repeat of his lengthy suspension and lack of pay. He has made it clear to the JSC that he is eager to return to work on the condition that no immediate suspension would follow. His lengthy absence and the uncertainty surrounding his situation raise concerns about accountability and transparency in Fiji’s legal system.
Importantly, this situation sheds light on the complexities and challenges that public officials face within Fiji’s judicial framework, emphasizing the critical need for improvements in judicial processes and inter-agency communication. Stakeholders in the legal community remain hopeful that resolving Pryde’s issues may eventually lead to reforms that enhance public confidence in the country’s legal institutions. This case represents not only a challenge for Pryde but also an opportunity for meaningful change within Fiji’s judiciary.
Leave a comment