A Fiji court heard that data from a mobile device allegedly used to link former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama with former Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho in 2021 has been lost after the phone was factory reset. The information was presented by the State during the ongoing trial.
Key details from the proceedings:
– The Director of Public Prosecutions filed a data-extraction report concerning the phone earlier today, and the defense was given until the end of today to review it.
– The prosecution plans to call two witnesses: the investigating officer and a cybercrime unit officer. They aim to wrap up the case by midday tomorrow when the trial resumes.
– Bainimarama is charged with one count of making unwarranted demands as a public official. Qiliho faces two counts of abuse of office.
– It is alleged that between May and August 2021, Bainimarama pressured then-Acting Police Commissioner Rusiate Tudravu to dismiss two officers, Sergeant Penieli Ratei and Constable Tomasi Naulu, or resign.
– Qiliho is accused of overriding Tudravu’s disciplinary decisions and unlawfully terminating both officers between August 5 and August 18, 2021.
Related testimony and context from prior proceedings have illustrated how these events unfolded. Tudravu has previously testified that he did not rebel or resign in response to Bainimarama’s demands and that he chose to take the matter “in stride,” noting he did not keep records of the exchanges at the time. Defence questions over whether messages were recorded or preserved have featured prominently, with reference to the handling of communications within a Viber group related to the officers’ discipline.
Further background from the broader proceedings includes confirmation that documents such as search warrants and materials connected to Tudravu, Qiliho, and the officers have been central to building the timeline and the question of who directed disciplinary actions. In some testimony, details about a drug informant linked to a separate strand of the case—identified as Jonacani Bainimarama, the late brother of the former prime minister—were discussed, underscoring the complexity of evidence and the need to protect informants in ongoing investigations.
Observers view the case as a significant test of governance ethics, accountability, and the independence of Fiji’s public service. A transparent presentation of evidence and a fair ruling could reinforce public trust in institutions and across policing practices, while ensuring due process in civil-service procedures.
Added value and commentary:
– The proceedings highlight the ongoing balance between political oversight and professional police independence, a debate with implications for civil-service protections and accountability.
– If the allegations of undue political influence are proven, reforms in oversight and disciplinary procedures could follow within Fiji’s public service.
– If the defense proves actions were within the law and properly implemented, it would illustrate the limits of executive interference in internal disciplinary matters.
Short summary:
– Tudravu testified that he did not rebel or resign under Bainimarama’s pressure and that he did not immediately record or screenshot exchanges.
– Bainimarama faces a single unwarranted-demands count; Qiliho faces two counts of abuse of office for allegedly overriding disciplinary actions.
– The case centers on May–August 2021 and the handling of the termination or threatened termination of two officers, with further testimony anticipated on Viber communications and document handling.
Next steps for readers:
– Watch for Tudravu’s forthcoming testimony, which could be pivotal in determining whether there was improper political influence.
– Monitor filings and witness lists related to the Viber communications, search warrants, and documentation that may illuminate chain-of-command decisions.
Hopeful perspective:
– The ongoing trial represents an important opportunity for accountability and transparency in governance and policing. A thorough, careful presentation of evidence and an objective ruling could strengthen institutional integrity and public confidence in Fiji’s public service.
If you’re summarizing this for readers, you might emphasize the central questions: Was there inappropriate political influence over police disciplinary decisions, and were official actions properly documented and executed? The proceedings will likely continue to clarify these points as more witnesses and documentary material come to light.
Leave a comment