A surge in security agreements throughout the Pacific could be exacerbating tensions rather than alleviating potential conflicts, experts have expressed. This issue was a focal point at the recent Pacific Islands Political Studies Association conference held in Wellington, where delegates gathered to address the escalating geopolitical pressures in the region.
In a keynote address, Transform Aqorau, vice chancellor of Solomon Islands National University, articulated concerns that the Pacific is being treated as a geopolitical chessboard. He stressed the region comprises a network of sovereign nations with distinct aspirations that deserve recognition and respect. Drawing parallels to the Cold War era, Aqorau noted the re-emergence of terms like “spheres of influence,” which exert immense pressure on local leaders to take sides in the face of intensified U.S.-China rivalry.
Aqorau emphasized that the historical presence of Chinese communities in the Pacific challenges narratives that depict the region’s nations as passive pawns in great power games. The complicating factor is the growing complexity of regional politics, where Pacific leaders may traditionally have navigated external tensions to benefit their constituencies, but can now find such a balancing act increasingly challenging.
The potential for conflict, particularly in the event of a U.S.-China confrontation over Taiwan, underscores the urgent need for Pacific nations to fortify their regional institutions, such as the Pacific Islands Forum. Aqorau advocates for diversifying partnerships beyond the U.S. and China, encouraging ties with middle powers like Japan, India, and the European Union. He argues that any security frameworks should reflect the unique cultural, social, and environmental contexts of the Pacific.
Concerns about militarization prompted Dr. Anna Powles, co-creator of a Pacific defense diplomacy tracker, to highlight the implications of nearly 800 security deals signed since 2018, questioning what behaviors might be expected from Pacific nations in the context of such agreements in potential armed conflicts.
The New Zealand government is now considering “strategic trust” clauses in its security agreements with Pacific nations, aimed at clarifying obligations and responsibilities amid rising Chinese influences, especially following recent partnerships like that between the Cook Islands and China.
Furthermore, the conference discussions highlighted the problematic nature of transparency concerning security agreements. For example, a recent China-Solomon Islands security deal has been criticized for its clandestine nature, which breeds public distrust and potentially destabilizing domestic conflicts.
Nonetheless, there remains a thread of hope as Pacific leaders are encouraged to forge a united front and engage more deeply in constructive dialogues around security that emphasize peacebuilding and developmental goals. This approach not only affirms their sovereignty but also sets the stage for cooperative regional solutions amidst the evolving geopolitical landscape.
Leave a comment