Former parliamentarian Niko Nawaikula’s leave-to-appeal against the High Court’s dismissal of his constitutional redress application has been denied. This decision came after Mr. Nawaikula sought redress regarding a case involving a magistrate, which he claimed was improperly directed by the late former Chief Justice Kamal Kumar for transfer to the High Court—a move he argued was unjust.
Justice Pita Bulamainaivalu ruled against Mr. Nawaikula, stating that he failed to demonstrate any valid argument indicating that the dismissal of his application was incorrect. The judge indicated that Mr. Nawaikula’s five grounds for appeal were insufficient, emphasizing, “There is neither an arguable case nor real prospects of success.” In addition to the dismissal, Mr. Nawaikula has been ordered to pay $2,000 to the Attorney-General’s office.
This ruling highlights the court’s view that Mr. Nawaikula’s approach to appeal represented an abuse of the judicial process, as there were adequate alternative remedies available to him. Furthermore, Justice Bulamainaivalu noted that the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC), associated with the case, was not assigned any costs due to the unique context surrounding this matter.
Looking forward, while the legal route remains complex for Mr. Nawaikula, his intentions to continue the appeal process reflect a commitment to seeking justice. The ongoing judicial proceedings emphasize the importance of adhering to legal standards and encourage a thorough examination of the principles of due process.
As the appeal progresses, observers hope for a clearer interpretation of the law, potentially setting precedents for similar cases in the future and reaffirming the rule of law in the Fijian judicial system.
Leave a comment