After an extensive eight-year legal battle, significant progress has been made in the judicial review concerning the Tui Nadi title, following a recent ruling by the High Court in Lautoka. Justice Mohammed Mackie has approved an application filed by Ratu Asiveni Dawai on behalf of his late uncle, Ratu Kaliova Dawai, which allows this longstanding title dispute to be formally examined in court.
This ruling, delivered earlier this week, has reignited hope for those involved in the case and may establish an important precedent for future land rights disputes. The decision addressed a previous ruling from December 5, 2017, by the iTaukei Lands Appeals Tribunal (ILAT) and the iTaukei Lands and Fisheries Commission (ILFC), which appointed Ratu Vuniani Navuniuci as Tui Nadi. Ratu Asiveni challenged this decision, alleging it was made in bad faith and ignored prior court orders.
Justice Mackie emphasized that the respondents did not adhere to a consent judgment dated January 24, 2007, which required parties to resolve their disputes. Instead, they proceeded to appoint Ratu Vuniani unlawfully. The court reaffirmed that this consent judgment remains in effect and ordered all respondents to pay $2,500 each in court costs to the applicant.
This ruling sheds light on the ongoing battle for indigenous land rights and underscores the significance of judicial oversight in resolving such disputes. Similar issues have been noted in other cases, like those involving the ancestral land claims of the Nauluvatu clan in Suva, echoing broader concerns surrounding historical titles and land ownership rights rooted in Fiji’s colonial past.
The outcome of this judicial review is perceived as a pivotal moment for the rights of the iTaukei community. It reflects the determination of those advocating for rightful land claims and encourages hope for justice and reconciliation concerning the ownership and recognition of ancestral lands in Fiji. The advancements made in this case may signal a more equitable future for communities seeking justice in indigenous land rights.
Leave a comment