Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo has expressed strong condemnation of suspended Director of Public Prosecutions Christopher Pryde’s actions in attempting to set conditions for his participation in tribunal hearings. According to Justice Temo, Pryde’s insistence that he will only attend if his salary is restored is both unfair and inappropriate.
During courtroom proceedings, Justice Temo stated that Pryde is a highly capable lawyer and can represent himself. If financial constraints are an issue, he is eligible to seek assistance through Legal Aid. Temo underscored Pryde’s qualifications as Fiji’s foremost prosecutor and noted his ability to navigate the legal landscape independently.
In discussing financial matters, Justice Temo raised concerns regarding Pryde’s management of his superannuation payments. He revealed that since 2012, Pryde has paid himself over $288,000, funds that were not sanctioned by appropriate bodies such as the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) or the Office of the Attorney-General. Justice Temo characterized this misappropriation of funds as theft and emphasized that taxpayers are adversely affected by these transactions.
Further clarifying the situation, Justice Temo indicated that it was under Pryde’s purview as DPP to approve such payments, and he confirmed that there is no recorded approval for the superannuation since his appointment as Solicitor-General in 2012.
The tribunal remains focused on the allegations of misconduct and has indicated its recommendation for the removal of Pryde from his position. Additional scrutiny is also placed on Pryde’s conduct, including a notable meeting he had with Sayed-Khaiyum while the latter was under criminal investigation.
The proceedings will continue tomorrow at 10 am.
In summary, this situation revolves around serious allegations of financial misconduct involving the suspended DPP. Justice Temo’s steadfast position emphasizes accountability within the legal system, hopefully leading to a resolution that restores public trust in Fiji’s judicial processes. As the tribunal investigates these claims, it serves as a reminder of the importance of integrity and transparency in public service roles.
Leave a comment