The Judicial Services Commission (JSC) is currently facing intense scrutiny amid allegations of incompetence and dysfunction regarding its management of key legal figures, particularly Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Christopher Pryde and Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) Commissioner Barbara Malimali.
On Monday, President Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu appointed Nancy Tikoisuva as the Acting DPP following a recommendation from the JSC. This appointment comes just weeks after Ms. Tikoisuva resigned from the same position, occurring on January 20, after Mr. Pryde was reinstated. Tomasi Bainivalu, the Chief Registrar and JSC secretary, stated that Ms. Tikoisuva’s role is vital due to Mr. Pryde’s ongoing absence, as he is currently in New Zealand addressing new allegations from senior management at the DPP office.
Mr. Pryde’s reinstatement was marred by complications. Shortly after returning on January 17, a new complaint emerged, leading to an investigation that cost taxpayers over $88,000. The JSC has not clarified whether another tribunal will be set up regarding these ongoing issues.
Opposition MP Jone Usamate condemned the government for perceived double standards, highlighting how swiftly the JSC acted to remove officials like the Chief Justice and others in the past. He pointed out that FICAC’s independence is established in Section 115 of the Constitution, but he emphasized that there are no specified disciplinary procedures for its commissioner, leaving room for the JSC to act. Usamate argued that if the JSC exercised authority previously to deal with judicial officers, it should similarly address the complaints involving FICAC’s leadership.
Former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry echoed these concerns, criticizing the JSC’s management of both the DPP and FICAC. He argued that Tikoisuva’s reappointment contradicts Mr. Pryde’s delegated authority to Assistant DPP Paulini Madanavosa in his absence, further indicating a period of dysfunction within both offices.
In light of these troubling developments, it is crucial for the JSC to restore confidence and function effectively to uphold justice and transparency within Fiji’s legal institutions. The public and political leaders alike are advocating for equitable treatment under the law and a fair approach to disciplinary actions regarding all officials, regardless of their positions.
As the political landscape evolves, there remains hope that these issues will catalyze improvements in the accountability mechanisms of Fiji’s judicial administration. Ultimately, ensuring a stable and transparent legal framework is essential for fostering trust in public institutions.
Leave a comment