The Suva Magistrates Court is currently awaiting a motion from defense attorney Davenesh Sharma regarding the case against former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama and former Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho. This motion is filed under Section 44(5) of Fiji’s Constitution, which pertains to social justice and affirmative action by stating that special measures should not be enacted once substantial equality has been met.
Bainimarama faces charges of making unwarranted demands as a public official, while Qiliho is charged with two counts of abuse of office. The allegations suggest that Bainimarama pressured the Acting Commissioner of Police, Rusiate Tudravu, from May 21 to August 18, 2021, to dismiss Sergeant Penieli Ratei and Police Constable Tomasi Naulu. Reports indicate that Bainimarama threatened to resign if Tudravu did not comply with his demands.
Qiliho is also accused of misusing his authority by reversing a disciplinary action decided by Tudravu that resulted in a five-day paid suspension for Ratei and Naulu, instead opting to terminate their employment entirely. This decision has raised concerns about the abuse of power among senior officials.
The case has garnered significant public attention, highlighting the critical issues of accountability and good governance in Fiji. The next court mention is scheduled for April 11, maintaining public interest as a pre-trial conference is anticipated.
The trial itself is set for June 2 to July 11, 2025, with around 30 witnesses expected to provide testimony. This legal battle offers a pivotal opportunity to reaffirm the principles of transparency and accountability in governance, fostering a hopeful outlook for improved ethical standards in Fiji’s political landscape.
Leave a comment