Fiji’s Work Care Bill Sparks Controversy Over Worker Representation

A union representative has raised serious concerns regarding the absence of worker representation on the Work Care Board in Fiji, which oversees the compensation scheme. Aisake Rabuli, a representative from the Communications, Mining and General Workers Union, expressed his apprehensions during a session of the Standing Committee on Economic Affairs concerning Bill No. 7 of 2025 Work Care Bill. He stated that without any trade union or injured worker representatives on the board, there is a significant lack of transparency and an inadequate voice for workers in matters that directly impact their welfare.

Supporting Rabuli’s viewpoint, Opposition MP Semi Koroilavesau mentioned that the proposed Bill includes provisions to appoint a worker representative to the board. It suggests a collaborative approach with three members from worker organizations, three from employers, and three representing the Government. This adjustment seems to address concerns regarding worker representation that have been highlighted during ongoing discussions about the Bill.

However, the committee’s deputy chairperson, Premila Kumar, questioned the necessity of such a large board, pointing out the efficiency of the previous Accident Compensation Commission Fiji (ACCF) system, which operated effectively with a smaller personnel. Rabuli countered, arguing that a larger board could foster constructive dialogue and lead to a more effective Work Care Bill.

This ongoing debate reflects broader sentiments among stakeholders regarding the adequacy of protections for injured workers and transparency in the legislative process. Concerns have been raised not only about representation but also about the Bill’s ability to address various types of workplace injuries, including mental health issues, which continue to be overlooked in the proposed legislation.

The discussions signal a hopeful opportunity for reform in Fiji’s labor laws, with the potential for legislative adjustments that could enhance worker protections while also fostering a cooperative environment beneficial to both employees and employers. As the consultations proceed, there is optimism for achieving a balanced framework that addresses the needs of all stakeholders involved.