A short state visit by India’s president and the resumption of Parliament have drawn public attention in Suva, but behind the headlines Fiji faces persistent, interconnected challenges: stalled resettlement and housing shortages across hundreds of informal settlements, and thousands of vacant chiefly and customary leadership roles that weaken local governance.
Housing and resettlement stalled
– Government agencies say funding shortfalls and resistance from some illegal settlers have delayed resettlement efforts, leaving thousands of families in limbo. Officials note that launching housing projects is complex and time‑consuming.
– There are more than 250 informal settlements on state, iTaukei and freehold land nationwide. Waisasa Settlement in Tacirua has been flagged in discussions about possible eviction of around 100 families, though it is not currently listed among active development sites.
– Since 2010 the iTaukei Land Trust Board has issued more than 40 land development leases intended to relocate squatters, but tangible resettlement outcomes have been limited.
– The Public Rental Board (PRB) has moved to smaller-scale redevelopments to create immediate options: 36 Lagilagi units at Jittu Estate in Raiwaqa — long unoccupied — have been refurbished and are being prepared for rental or sale, with poverty‑alleviation supports and assistance for tenants who wish to return to rural areas.
Vacant vanua leadership undermines progress
– The Permanent Secretary for iTaukei Affairs reports that more than 6,000 chiefly and customary positions remain unfilled, with occupancy rates near 47 percent in recent years. Prolonged vacancies weaken vanua governance that is central to land negotiations, dispute resolution and community cohesion.
– The iTaukei Lands and Fisheries Commission has been conducting province‑by‑province consultations to fill Bose Vanua roles; recent rounds reportedly achieved roughly an 80 percent success rate and will be followed by training for newly appointed leaders.
Why the two problems are linked
– Customary and chiefly leaders play a pivotal role in securing landowner consent and guiding community consultations. Vacancies in these roles make it harder to achieve community buy‑in for resettlement and redevelopment, creating delays and heightening the risk of conflict.
– Conversely, visible, well‑managed housing projects that combine clear tenure arrangements and livelihood pathways can help rebuild trust between communities, landowners and government agencies, making future initiatives smoother.
Practical recommendations
– Coordinate across ministries, landowners and traditional institutions so vanua leaders are engaged from the outset.
– Prioritise transparent, community‑led consultations and clear timelines before any eviction or resettlement action to reduce conflict and identify culturally appropriate options.
– Use small redevelopments like Jittu Estate as pilot projects to demonstrate standards, tenant supports and links to livelihoods; successful pilots can attract further investment.
– Explore blended financing models combining government funds, PRB resources and development partners to accelerate delivery.
– Provide targeted training and support for newly appointed Bose Vanua so they can effectively participate in land‑use discussions and dispute resolution.
– Improve public communications — regular updates and a public dashboard tracking settlements and project status could reduce uncertainty and build confidence.
Logical explanation
– Filling chiefly vacancies is not only cultural but practical: customary leaders are often the primary decision‑makers on land issues. Without them, negotiations stall, consent processes become harder and technical solutions face local resistance. Addressing leadership gaps and delivering small, tangible housing successes are mutually reinforcing steps.
Summary
Fiji’s immediate political events risk overshadowing long‑running structural problems: widespread housing insecurity and gaps in customary leadership. The combination of funding shortfalls, on‑the‑ground resistance and vacant vanua positions has slowed resettlement, but targeted actions — province‑level leadership drives, small-scale housing pilots, blended financing and clearer community engagement — offer practical pathways forward.
A hopeful note
Recent progress — the PRB’s refurbishment of Jittu Estate units and reported success in filling many Bose Vanua roles — shows that achievable, visible wins are possible. Well‑managed pilots that pair decent housing with livelihood supports and trained local leaders can build trust, attract investment and create momentum for larger, sustainable solutions.
Additional comments for editors/publishers
– Consider publishing a regular tracker or explainer that maps major settlements, project timelines and agency responsibilities to help readers follow progress and hold stakeholders accountable.
– When reporting on potential evictions, ensure stories include available alternatives, legal safeguards and information on support programs to inform affected families.
– Interviews with newly appointed Bose Vanua and residents of pilot redevelopments would add human perspective and illustrate how policy changes play out at community level.
Leave a comment