Fiji is currently experiencing a critical moment in its political landscape as Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka seeks to amend the 2013 Constitution, having gained sufficient support in Parliament to proceed to the next legislative step. A coalition government secured backing from four independent opposition MPs, achieving the necessary three-quarter majority needed for the second reading of the bill. The voting results showed 41 MPs in favor, 13 against, and one abstaining.
The proposed Constitution Amendment Bill 2025 aims to refine the process by which constitutional amendments are made, including a potential elimination of the referendum requirement that currently mandates changes to be approved by three-quarters of registered voters, in line with historical precedent. According to Section 160 of the Constitution, significant changes need extensive support, highlighting the carefully structured checks and balances in place.
Distinguished Professor Steven Ratuva, a political commentator and expert at Canterbury University, has voiced concerns about political overload in Fiji, suggesting that any changes should not be rushed. He noted that the current political environment is fraught with fragmentation among parties and that it is important for the government to engage in comprehensive consultations to avoid exacerbating divisions within society.
Ratuva emphasized the dangers of making constitutional changes too easy or too rigid, as both outcomes could instigate instability, potentially leading to extra-legal attempts at change. He highlighted that careful consideration ought to guide the amendment process, ensuring that it prioritizes national interests over political emotions or community-specific agendas.
Rabuka himself has faced questions about the motivations behind the amendment push. Critics have drawn parallels to past government actions perceived as lacking transparency and consultation. Ratuva noted that the previous constitution was hastily adopted and lacked the broad consensus necessary for legitimacy. Amendments are being framed as not only a response to previous governance concerns but also as a necessary evolution reflecting Fiji’s current societal dynamics.
Furthermore, discussions surrounding the identity implications are ongoing, particularly concerning the term “Fijian” and its recognition among non-iTaukei residents. Rabuka has previously indicated a commitment to inclusive identity representation, recognizing that labels hold significant importance in a multicultural society.
This situation presents both challenges and opportunities for Fiji, emphasizing the need for collaboration and open dialogue among all political factions. The hope lies in creating a constitutional framework that not only reflects the diverse aspirations of the Fijian populace but also fortifies unity and cooperation within the nation. There is optimism that through this process of reform, Fiji can lay the groundwork for a more inclusive and stable governance structure that serves all its citizens well.
Leave a comment