As a survivor of the December 5, 2006 military coup in Fiji, I wish to commend Marcus Brand, chairperson of the Fiji Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), for his pledge to uphold the Commission’s vital functions. The TRC aims to enhance social cohesion and national unity by fostering dialogue among survivors of previous coups and their perpetrators, promoting mutual understanding and forgiveness.
Archbishop Peter Loy Chong has made a wise recommendation for the Commission to commence its hearings with victims. This approach allows for a thoughtful preparation before later interactions with former perpetrators, ensuring that victims receive the recognition they deserve. It also frames the context of the crimes, especially considering the immunity clauses established in Chapter 10 of the 2013 Constitution. These clauses provide total immunity to public officials for actions taken between December 2006 and the first parliamentary session after the Constitution’s adoption, leaving victims vulnerable and seeking justice in a system that largely overlooks their plight.
The consequences of this immunity framework are stark, creating substantial barriers for victims striving for acknowledgment of their experiences. For instance, civil service officials who were wrongfully dismissed face systemic obstacles, as the Constitution prohibits any judicial review of these immunity provisions. This situation undermines the fundamental principles of justice and questions the Constitution’s legitimacy, reflecting a stark imbalance that favors perpetrators while leaving victims in the shadows.
The TRC’s mission also encompasses addressing the historical injustices experienced by Indo-Fijian cane farming families, who have suffered greatly due to lapsed land leases. Many of these families have been uprooted without adequate governmental support, depriving them of their livelihoods and ties to ancestral lands. Recognizing such narratives is critical for the TRC to foster genuine healing across Fiji’s diverse communities.
Learning from the experiences of truth commissions in similar contexts, like the one established in the Solomon Islands, could provide valuable insights for Fiji. The Solomon Islands Commission emphasized truth-telling and justice, favoring acknowledgment of suffering over punitive measures. Such examples illustrate the importance of the TRC in Fiji tailoring its practices to fit the local socio-cultural environment, ensuring a thorough reconciliation process.
To facilitate meaningful change, the TRC must confront the constitutional obstacles that obstruct the recognition of human rights violations. Advocates propose that traditional practices, such as the iTaukei matanigasau ceremony, can promote healing and forgiveness, symbolizing a collective commitment to unity. The success of the TRC relies on the active participation of communities and the readiness of all stakeholders to engage in dialogue that leads to a shared comprehension of the past.
This journey toward reconciliation is vital not just for those directly impacted by past grievances but also for the nation as a whole, nurturing an inclusive spirit as Fiji embraces its complex identity. As the Commission embarks on this essential endeavor, there is optimism that through collective efforts in acknowledging and confronting painful truths, transformative healing can be realized.
Leave a comment