A short state visit by India’s President Droupadi Murmu has drawn public attention in Suva this week, but local focus is shared with Parliament’s resumption and deeper, long‑running social challenges that require urgent, coordinated action.
Political context
Political analysts and academics have warned the recent split in the opposition may weaken parliamentary oversight, making it harder for opposition parties to hold the government to account during this parliamentary sitting.
Housing and resettlement: progress and persistent barriers
Government agencies acknowledge that resettlement and affordable housing efforts remain slow. Two key constraints are cited repeatedly: limited funding and resistance from some occupants of informal settlements. Officials note that launching new housing projects is complex and time‑consuming, which helps explain delays for thousands of families.
– Scope of the problem: There are more than 250 informal settlements on state, iTaukei and freehold land across Fiji.
– Local flashpoint: Discussions have been reported about the possible eviction of around 100 families at Waisasa Settlement in Tacirua, though Waisasa is not currently listed among active development projects.
– Land‑use attempts: Since 2010 the iTaukei Land Trust Board has issued over 40 land development leases intended to relocate squatters; however, tangible large‑scale resettlement outcomes have been limited.
Positive, tangible steps
Alongside those challenges, there are practical, immediate moves that could ease pressure and build public confidence.
– Public Rental Board refurbishment: The PRB has refurbished 36 Lagilagi units at Jittu Estate in Raiwaqa — long unoccupied — and plans to offer them for rent or purchase. Officials say tenancy could be paired with poverty‑alleviation supports and livelihood assistance, and arrangements are being discussed to help tenants who choose to return to rural communities.
– Small redevelopment pilots: These kinds of smaller projects are being viewed as possible proof‑of‑concepts to show quality, tenant supports and links to livelihoods before scaling larger programs.
Vacant vanua leadership and its link to land solutions
A major governance challenge compounds housing problems: thousands of chiefly and customary roles in the vanua remain vacant.
– Scale of vacancies: More than 6,000 chiefly and customary positions are reported vacant, with recent occupancy around 47 percent.
– Commission action: Officers from the iTaukei Lands and Fisheries Commission are conducting province‑by‑province consultations to fill Bose Vanua roles; recent rounds reportedly achieved around an 80 percent success rate, with training planned for newly appointed leaders.
Why this matters: customary and chiefly leaders play a central role in land negotiations, dispute resolution and community consent. Vacancies in those roles make it harder to secure landowner buy‑in for resettlement or redevelopment, slowing projects and increasing the risk of conflict. Conversely, occupied and trained vanua leadership can accelerate community‑led solutions and reduce resistance to change.
Practical recommendations
– Coordinate planning across ministries, landowners and traditional leaders so vanua representatives are involved from the outset.
– Prioritise transparent, community‑led consultations before any eviction or resettlement steps to reduce conflict and identify culturally appropriate options.
– Use small redevelopments such as the Jittu Estate refurbishment as pilots to demonstrate standards, tenant supports and livelihood linkages. Successful pilots can attract further investment.
– Explore blended financing (government funds, PRB resources and development partners) to accelerate delivery of affordable units.
– Provide rapid training and ongoing support for newly appointed Bose Vanua so they can effectively engage in land‑use discussions and dispute resolution.
– Improve public communications with clear timelines and regular updates on settlement status, development plans and tenancy outcomes — a public dashboard could enhance transparency and accountability.
Additional comments and explanation
– Linking tenure and leadership reform: Filling vacant chiefly positions is both a cultural priority and a practical governance step to unblock land negotiations and resettlement pathways. When traditional leaders are engaged and informed, they often broker solutions that are respectful of custom and workable for government programs.
– Sequencing for momentum: Finish and publicise small, high‑quality housing redevelopments; pair tenancy with livelihood and poverty‑alleviation supports; scale successful models using blended funding; and continue to fill and train vanua leadership to facilitate broader community acceptance.
– Communications matter: Clear timelines and frequent public updates from housing agencies can reduce uncertainty, lower tensions in impacted communities and build confidence among landowners and potential funders.
Summary
Fiji faces intertwined challenges of housing insecurity and gaps in customary leadership. While systemic obstacles remain — financing limits, community resistance and long planning cycles — there are practical entry points for progress: refurbishing idle housing stock, piloting small redevelopments paired with livelihood supports, filling and training vanua leaders, and improving coordination and transparency. These targeted actions can create visible wins that rebuild trust and provide a foundation for larger‑scale solutions.
A hopeful note
Small, well‑managed successes can build momentum. Demonstrable outcomes — decent, occupied homes linked to tenancy supports and trained local leaders — can show communities and landowners that resettlement and redevelopment are fair and feasible, creating the trust needed for larger projects to follow.
Leave a comment