There is a necessity for more defined connections between strategies and key performance indicators (KPIs) in Fiji’s development framework. Jenny Seeto, chairperson of Investment Fiji, highlighted that while KPIs are meant to reflect the results of implemented strategies, the relationships presented in the National Development Plan (NDP) report are not always clear.
“I reviewed the strategies and KPIs and tried to identify the connections between them,” Ms. Seeto stated. “In some instances, the linkages were not apparent, but I concluded that KPIs truly represent the outcomes of all developed strategies.”
Looking back at Fiji’s historical context, Ms. Seeto noted that the country had once been ahead of Singapore but has since fallen behind. She questioned the reasons within Fijian culture and lifestyle that hinder collaboration.
“It is essential for us to establish a strong work ethic and values so we can work together towards a common goal of overcoming the poverty trap we seem to be in. We require an effective monitoring and evaluation mechanism to track our progress,” she emphasized.
She also pointed out the importance of having reliable, evidence-based data to assess performance against KPIs, suggesting that this would enable both organizations and the government to properly gauge their achievements rather than merely reporting favorable outcomes.
“I have often observed organizations and even the government discussing achievements related to KPIs, and I think we need to convey a clear message,” she remarked. “There should be no fear in acknowledging that we may not have fully met the KPIs without embellishment.
“We must be honest with ourselves; otherwise, we will not accomplish the KPIs that we aspire to achieve.”