Former Police Commissioner Sitiveni Qiliho told the Suva High Court that he did not lie about his evidence and that former Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama had no authority over him in his role as employer. He stressed that the Fiji Police Force operates independently and that there was no interference from Bainimarama.
Qiliho also denied using the Solicitor General’s Office to justify any arbitrary action against two officers whom he terminated. The cross-examination by the State is ongoing before Judge Justice Thushara Rajasinghe.
The charges connect Bainimarama to alleged unwarranted pressure on then-Acting Commissioner Rusiate Tudravu to dismiss two officers, Sergeant Penieli Ratei and Police Constable Tomasi Naulu, or to resign. It is alleged that, between May 21 and August 18, 2021, while Qiliho was Commissioner, he directed the termination of Ratei and Naulu without due process, abusing his authority and prejudicing the officers’ rights.
Observers view the case as a test of accountability and governance ethics in Fiji, highlighting the tension between political leadership and due process for public officers. The trial is expected to conclude today.
Context and related testimony from earlier hearings show Tudravu’s appointment followed formal procedures, including letters from the President after a vetting process. Tudravu testified that the Commissioner of Police does not meddle with the disciplinary tribunal’s processes; rather, police leadership endorses tribunal recommendations. He also indicated that orders to terminate reportedly came directly from Qiliho, with Ratei and Naulu given only three days to respond—much shorter than the usual fourteen days.
The State, represented by Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Laisani Tabuakuro, has signaled a robust case, with a plan to call a substantial number of witnesses. The defense is led by Davenesh Sharma for Bainimarama and Gul Fatima for Qiliho. The proceedings have focused renewed attention on governance, accountability, and the protections afforded to civil servants within Fiji’s public service.
Editor’s note: This high-profile case sits at the crossroads of political accountability and the independence of the police service. As testimonies unfold, the proceedings could shape broader discussions about the balance of power, due process, and officer rights in Fiji. A transparent, well-documented resolution would bolster public trust in institutions and demonstrate a commitment to ethical governance.
Summary of key points:
– Qiliho denies lying and asserts police independence with no Bainimarama interference.
– Bainimarama is accused of pressuring Tudravu to dismiss Ratei and Naulu or resign.
– Qiliho is accused of abusing his office by directing termination without due process between August 5 and August 18, 2021.
– Tudravu’s testimony and other witnesses have highlighted formal appointment processes and the role of the police leadership in disciplinary matters.
– The State plans to call numerous witnesses; the trial continues in Suva High Court.
Leave a comment