The recent arrest and detention of Charlie Charters, a citizen publisher who has been revealing confidential information allegedly connected to the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) on social media, has ignited a significant discussion regarding the legal justifications behind such actions. Senior lawyer Richard Naidu has raised critical questions about whether FICAC has the legal grounds to detain Charters based on existing laws.
Naidu highlighted that while the FICAC Commissioner possesses the authority to prevent the departure of individuals being investigated for crimes under the FICAC Act, this authority must relate to a specific offense defined by the Act. He emphasized that Section 13G of the FICAC Act, which pertains to the disclosure of official information, strictly applies to current and former officers of the Commission and its staff. The statute forbids these individuals from disclosing information acquired through their official roles without authorization from the Commissioner.
Crucially, the law does not extend its provisions to the general public, meaning that individuals like Charters, who merely receive or share information, are not covered under this regulation. Naidu pointed out that while FICAC may be unsettled by disclosures that could tarnish its reputation, the Act only permits actions against its own personnel for unauthorized information sharing.
As the legal community grapples with the implications of Charters’ case, Naidu called into question what offense, if any, FICAC could cite to justify Charters’ detention, since the legislation does not criminalize the act of receiving or disseminating leaked information by someone outside the Commission.
This incident raises broader concerns regarding freedom of expression and the responsibilities of information dissemination in the digital age. The outcome of this case could have significant repercussions for the relationship between citizen journalists and governmental agencies, potentially setting a precedent for how confidential information is handled and reported in the future.
Leave a comment