Sanjeswar Ram, the Director of Corporate Services for the Fiji Elections Office, has refuted claims of disloyalty or animosity towards former Supervisor of Elections, Mohamed Saneem, following Ram’s own three-year suspension. In court, Ram was confronted by defense lawyer Devanesh Sharma, who suggested that Ram had met with Supervisor of Elections Ana Mataiciwa regarding a $55,000 tax reimbursement issue connected to Saneem, aiming to prevent Saneem’s return. Ram firmly denied such intentions.
This statement was part of the ongoing legal proceedings involving Saneem and former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum. Allegations against Saneem include improperly benefiting from government funds and obstructing adherence to electoral regulations. His legal troubles have prompted multiple testimonies, including those from Mataiciwa, who questioned the procedural integrity within the organization and underscored challenges in institutional trust.
Saneem also faces accusations of soliciting and receiving a tax relief benefit exceeding $50,000 for his personal advantage. The charges against him and Sayed-Khaiyum, which include abuse of office and corrupt benefits, bring significant ethical concerns to light. The case has been a contentious narrative featuring claims of rights violations and procedural misconduct.
The broader trial emphasizes the need for accountability and procedural transparency in Fiji, as it raises important questions about governance and trust within public institutions. Ram’s continued testimony, scheduled to resume, is expected to provide further insights into these allegations and the complex dynamics of leadership and governance within the Fijian electoral framework. The outcome of the trial holds the potential to influence future governance practices and restore public trust in governmental operations.
Leave a comment