Fiji Supreme Court affirms 2013 Constitution as legally effective, outlines clear path for amendments
The Supreme Court of Fiji has ruled that the 2013 Constitution is the legally binding framework for the country, and it affirmed that Parliament may proceed with amendments to certain provisions only if they meet strict thresholds: a two-thirds majority in Parliament for readings and a majority of voters in a national referendum for the changes to take legal effect.
Under the court’s ruling, amendments to Chapter 11 and parts of Chapter 12 may be advanced if the second and third readings receive the required two-thirds supermajority of all Members of Parliament. However, for those amendments to become legally effective, they must also be approved by a majority of voters who participate in a national referendum. The court emphasized that the referendum threshold is a simple majority of those who actually vote, not of all registered voters—a reinterpretation aimed at enabling feasible constitutional change.
The ruling also clarifies that the widely cited higher three-quarters threshold for certain amendments remains in the constitutional design, but it is now understood within the broader framework that includes the referendum requirement to bind changes legally. In a related line of reasoning, the court reiterated that the 1997 Constitution is no longer valid or applicable within Fiji’s legal order.
This decision follows a broader week in which the court had already acknowledged the 2013 Constitution through common law, despite recognizing its imposition and the absence of broad public endorsement at the time of its adoption. The government’s Cabinet had referred questions about amendment provisions and the status of the 1997 Constitution to the court under Section 91(5) of the constitution, seeking clarity on how the amendment process should operate and what reforms might be feasible going forward.
Implications for Fiji’s constitutional reform trajectory are significant. The ruling preserves a structured pathway for changes, anchoring them in parliamentary procedure while reinforcing the need for popular consent through a referendum. It could bolster public trust by ensuring that meaningful reforms are both legislatively supported and democratically validated, and it provides a transparent framework for future amendments.
What to watch next
– How Parliament will approach proposed amendments to the 2013 Constitution under the court’s interpretation, including any bills designed to pass at the second and third readings.
– The planning and timing of referenda tied to eligible amendments, and how political parties, civil society, and the public engage with the process.
– The ongoing debate about the status of the 1997 Constitution and whether any elements might be revived or reconciled with the 2013 framework.
– Whether subsequent advisory opinions or judgments expand on the interpretation of Sections 159 and 160, and how these influence Fiji’s broader governance and reform calendar.
Summary
The ruling marks a decisive moment in Fiji’s constitutional reform journey. By affirming the 2013 Constitution as legally effective and delineating the dual pathway of parliamentary approval plus referendum validation for amendments, the court provides a clear, enforceable roadmap for constitutional change. It also confirms that the 1997 Constitution is no longer a valid part of Fiji’s legal framework, reinforcing the shift toward the 2013 framework while underscoring the importance of public participation in reform.
Value-added perspective
– The decision underscores the balance Fiji seeks between legal stability and democratic legitimacy, emphasizing transparency and public involvement in constitutional decisions.
– For readers, tracking how amendment thresholds interact with past constitutional instruments can offer deeper insight into Fiji’s evolving constitutional landscape and the country’s commitment to governance that reflects the people’s will.
Hopeful note
This process presents an opportunity for Fiji to pursue constitutional reforms that are both principled and participatory, strengthening democratic legitimacy while preserving legal safeguards. A transparent pathway for amendments could empower citizens and lawmakers to shape a more responsive framework for Fiji’s future.
Leave a comment