During a recent appearance before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Justice, Law, and Human Rights, Pooja Dutt, Programme Manager of Dialogue Fiji, expressed her organization’s support for certain progressive features of the Education Bill 2025, while also voicing concerns about specific elements that could impact the education landscape adversely.
Dutt commended the Bill’s unequivocal ban on corporal punishment, highlighting it as a significant and forward-thinking reform that aligns with the global move towards more humane disciplinary practices in schools. She noted that this change is an essential step towards creating a safer and more supportive educational environment for students.
Nevertheless, Dutt cautioned against the provision for removing school zoning, which, while aimed at promoting parental choice, could potentially harm underfunded and less-resourced schools. The removal of boundaries could exacerbate inequalities, leading to the development of a two-tiered public education system, where wealthier families have more options, leaving disadvantaged schools struggling to survive.
Moreover, Dialogue Fiji raised alarms regarding the implications of school levies and fundraising provisions within the Bill. They questioned how these measures could undermine the principle of free education, particularly for low-income families. The organization pointed out the need for clarity on what constitutes “reasonable and equitable” financial expectations and how schools would handle instances of non-payment without resorting to student exclusion.
In its submission, Dialogue Fiji also recommended a review of school start times, proposing a shift to a 9 a.m. start in urban areas like Greater Suva. This adjustment could help alleviate traffic congestion while promoting student well-being by allowing for more manageable morning routines.
Finally, the organization underscored the importance of clearly defining the compulsory education age within the Act itself, referring to practices in countries like New Zealand where such definitions are set into law. This clarity is crucial, particularly in instances where penalties for non-compliance may arise.
The discussions surrounding the Education Bill 2025 continue to emphasize the need for policies that ensure equitable access to quality education for all students, reflecting a commitment to fostering an inclusive learning environment.
Leave a comment