Suspended Director of Public Prosecutions Christopher Pryde has described the allegations made by Acting Chief Justice Salesi Temo accusing him of embezzling taxpayer funds in Fiji as a ‘defamatory slur’ on his character. In an interview, Pryde emphasized the importance of challenging these claims.
He criticized the Acting Chief Justice for not referring the matter regarding his alleged misconduct to the appropriate authorities if there was any belief in the veracity of his claims. Pryde listed several points of contention, including:
– The failure of the Acting Chief Justice to report the supposed theft to the authorities.
– The outrageousness of the untrue statements made during the Tribunal.
– The alleged contempt of the Tribunal for the advice given to the President to unlawfully suspend his salary.
Pryde noted that in October, Chief Registrar Tomasi Bainivalu had sent a letter to his lawyers, proposing a settlement. However, he rejected this offer since he sought an official exoneration from the President regarding the claims against him. Following his refusal, the settlement offer was retracted.
Pryde asserted that it was unjust for the Tribunal to continue its proceedings without his presence, a position echoed by the Fiji Law Society. He expressed concern that the absence of his input allowed unchallenged statements, such as those from the Acting Chief Justice, to be perceived as valid. He also stated that his inability to present evidence led to significant unfairness and potential injustice.
In a letter from the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) dated October 7, it was conveyed to Pryde’s lawyers that he could receive a settlement of $200,000 if he resigns as DPP. Accepting this offer would conclude the proceedings and prevent any further legal action from him against the JSC.
This situation illustrates the complexities of legal and administrative accountability, particularly when public figures are involved. The case remains a crucial one for both the integrity of the judicial process and the rights of individuals facing serious allegations. It is also essential to ensure that all parties have the opportunity to present their case to achieve a just resolution.
As this matter unfolds, there is hope that the judicial system will ensure fairness and transparency, allowing for a resolution that is equitable for all involved.
Leave a comment