Attorney-General Graham Leung has addressed the potential for changes to the 2013 Constitution, proposing that one avenue to explore is seeking an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the amendment provisions. During a media briefing, Leung expressed that he believes a constitution should evolve and reflect the people’s will as circumstances change.
Leung noted that the government recognizes a desire for change among the populace and is actively listening to these sentiments. As 2025 approaches, which precedes a general election likely scheduled for 2026, he acknowledged that the government faces a packed legislative agenda.
The Attorney-General highlighted the decision that lies ahead for the government regarding how to proceed with constitutional amendments. He suggested that there could be a choice to tackle changes incrementally or to attempt a comprehensive review all at once. This flexibility is essential, as some changes may be more easily addressed than others.
Leung emphasized that revising the Constitution is a complex task that cannot be executed hastily. He reflected on the legality of the 1997 Constitution’s removal, pointing out the challenges of returning to it, especially considering the changes in the political landscape over the years.
He called for a thoughtful, bipartisan approach to reform, stressing that any change must involve discussions with various political factions and civil society groups. He warned against rapid changes that could unintentionally destabilize existing institutions, highlighting the intricate nature of constitutional law which governs all other laws within the country.
Referencing a comment from Professor Anthony Reagan of the Australian National University, Leung remarked on the difficulties associated with amending constitutions, citing the challenge of securing consensus among lawmakers and the public. He humorously likened the difficulty of achieving constitutional changes to a camel passing through a needle’s eye, asserting that while differing opinions are expected in a democracy, they must be respectful and constructive.
This dialogue around constitutional amendments reflects a proactive approach by the government in considering the needs and desires of its citizens, emphasizing a commitment to stability and comprehensive consultation. It suggests a hopeful trajectory toward a more responsive governance framework that seeks to honor democratic principles while navigating the complexities of constitutional law.
Summary: Attorney-General Graham Leung discusses the potential for amending the 2013 Constitution, emphasizing a careful and consultative approach, as the government considers how best to align with the public’s desire for change amid a busy legislative year leading up to the next general election in 2026.
Leave a comment