Opposition MP Viam Pillay has criticized the recently announced 2025-2026 National Budget, calling it a “candy budget” that disguises economic instability and unfulfilled promises with superficial measures. He claims that while the budget presents an appealing facade, it ultimately lacks structural support and sustainable relief for citizens.
Pillay drew a parallel to childhood experiences of quickly consuming sweets, stating that the budget offers temporary relief that vanishes as soon as it is spent. “The headlines may impress, but households see through the theatrics. This budget doesn’t create conditions for everyday survival; instead, it seems designed to distract,” he remarked.
The MP expressed frustration over the government’s adjustments to value-added tax (VAT), which saw a hike from 9% to 15% in the prior budget, only to be lowered to 12.5% this year. He conveyed skepticism regarding the government’s expectation of gratitude from the public for this reduction, branding it as “manipulation.” Pillay asserts that true tax reforms should not involve raising rates that burden citizens, only to retract them later.
Synthesizing insights from other opposition figures, there is a growing sentiment that Fijians are feeling the strain from rising costs, and many citizens face difficult choices between essentials like food and healthcare. Previous criticisms from MPs like Praveen Bala, who called the budget a “lollipop budget” promoting short-term electoral gains at long-term expense, resonate with Pillay’s views and illustrate a broader concern regarding the government’s financial strategy.
While the budget is met with skepticism, it fosters ongoing dialogue and scrutiny, suggesting a potential for revisions that could prioritize the actual needs of the public. Despite the criticism, the hope remains that this discourse will encourage a transformative approach to fiscal planning that ultimately benefits everyday Fijians.
Leave a comment