Justice David Ashton-Lewis has commended the candor of witnesses providing testimonies in the ongoing Commission of Inquiry regarding the appointment of Barbara Malimali as the Commissioner of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC). In a recent press briefing, the Justice stated, “Most times in courts, if it’s not criminal, people do their best. Very rarely do you find liars, but you do occasionally,” adding that, as of now, there are no indications of dishonesty from the witnesses involved.

To accommodate various logistical challenges, some witnesses have been testifying virtually, particularly those unable to travel from locations such as New Zealand and Australia. Justice Ashton-Lewis highlighted the commission’s responsibility to facilitate their participation, saying, “Our job is to get their evidence and to do what we can to assist.” Witnesses have the choice to attend in person or virtually, ensuring wider accessibility to the inquiry process.

Senior Barrister Janet Mason has pointed out that the timeline for the commission’s report may need revision, acknowledging the unanticipated duration of time being taken for witness testimonies. She stressed the importance of allowing adequate time for those potentially affected by the inquiry to voice their concerns, affirming a commitment to fairness in the proceedings.

Today’s hearing is set to include testimony from former President Ratu Wiliame Maivalili Katonivere, marking a significant progression in the inquiry’s exploration of political accountability. This investigation seeks to validate the legality and ethicality of Malimali’s appointment amid broader concerns regarding governance and integrity within the FICAC.

The ongoing inquiry signals a positive commitment to transparency and accountability in Fiji’s governance structures, which is essential for restoring public trust in government institutions. As the commission continues its work, there is hope that these efforts will lead to reforms enhancing the integrity of public appointments in the future.

This inquiry represents a vital step in ensuring that governance mechanisms remain ethical and transparent, promoting an environment where integrity is upheld in public service.