Tuna Commission Chair Dr. Josie Tamate is preparing for another challenging round of discussions on high-seas transshipment, an issue that has historically created divisions between Pacific states and distant-water fishing nations. She emphasized her role in guiding members toward reaching a consensus or, at the very least, establishing a clear path forward amidst the ongoing complexities.
In a recent interview in Manila, Dr. Tamate acknowledged the significant hurdles that lay ahead for the Commission. She stated, “All proposals are important for the Commission. But we have a finite time available to discuss and reach consensus.” Past discussions on transshipment have lacked resolution, leading to the decision during a prior Commission meeting in Fiji to dissolve the Working Group on transshipment. This year, however, the Commission faces two new proposals, and the responsibility to address them lies collectively with its members.
Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) have consistently raised concerns that current high-seas transshipment regulations are inadequate, creating loopholes that facilitate illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. Dr. Tamate reassured that these issues are a priority in the upcoming negotiations.
With two proposals now on the table, discussions are ongoing, supported by research commissioned by one of the SIDS. Dr. Tamate articulated that, “The key issue is that transshipment at high seas is not permitted except if it is ‘impractical’ for a vessel to go into an authorized port to tranship.” The Commission aims to enhance monitoring and compliance through various working groups focusing on observer programs and electronic monitoring and reporting.
However, the Chair recognized the challenges presented by distant-water fishing nations, which have shown reluctance toward stricter regulations. “My job as the Chair is to listen and facilitate the discussions in search of consensus,” she remarked. If consensus cannot be achieved, Dr. Tamate indicated that the Commission will aim to identify next steps and potential future tasks, possibly through intersessional working groups or subsidiary bodies that play a crucial role in the decision-making process of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC).
As WCPFC22 unfolds throughout the week, the discussions on transshipment are anticipated to be one of the focal points of negotiation, underscoring the crucial efforts needed to address sustainable fishing practices in the region. The outcomes of these talks could pave the way for improved regulations that ensure the long-term health of marine ecosystems and the livelihoods of communities dependent on fishing. Through collaborative efforts and open dialogue, there remains hope for a more equitable framework that aligns the interests of all parties involved.
Leave a comment