By Pita Ligaiula in Manila, Philippines
The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) Chair, Dr. Josie Tamate, has highlighted that the path to establishing a long-awaited management procedure for South Pacific albacore hinges on an important political decision: agreeing on a single Harvest Control Rule (HCR) and its associated application areas. As the Tuna Commission convenes for what is anticipated to be a pivotal meeting, Dr. Tamate stated that the scientific groundwork is complete, and the options are laid out, emphasizing that the Commission can no longer evade making a choice.
“The biggest sticking point from my perspective is agreeing on a Harvest Control Rule (HCR),” she remarked, indicating that there are still numerous options to consider at this stage. This meeting, referred to as WCPFC22, is essential as it marks the culmination of over a decade of promises towards a coherent South Pacific albacore harvest strategy. This gathering in Manila serves as a benchmark not only for Pacific states but also for markets and observers gauging the Commission’s ability to implement modern, science-based management practices.
Dr. Tamate pointed out that the scientific service provider, SPC, has performed admirably, delivering detailed analyses that address members’ requests. However, the crux of the matter lies in overcoming the political challenges that remain. “The Commission will need to agree on which HCR to use and also the area of application,” she elaborated. Specifically, the Commission faces a geographical decision with significant implications for longline fleets operating throughout the region, offering two options: one that starts from the equator going south, and another that begins at 10 degrees south.
Pacific Island countries have long advocated for a management framework that stabilizes catch rates, augments economic viability for domestic longline fleets, and curtails the erratic “boom and bust” cycles that have jeopardized investments. Dr. Tamate expressed confidence in the Commission’s efforts, noting that workshops and consultations throughout the year have aimed to address existing gaps.
Ultimately, for the harvest strategy to be implemented, the Commission must arrive at a consensus on the final HCR. Without such an agreement, the initiative stands at a standstill. As the meeting unfolds, the message from Dr. Tamate is unequivocal: the Tuna Commission must make a definitive choice.
With rising market pressure, impending Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification deadlines, and Pacific economies dependent on a robust functioning longline sector, the outcomes of this week’s discussions will be crucial. The decisions made will not only shape the future of South Pacific albacore but also test the credibility of the WCPFC itself. The ability of the Commission to reconcile differences on the Harvest Control Rule now stands as the defining challenge of WCPFC22. This pivotal moment presents an opportunity for positive and sustainable change in the management of fisheries in the region.
Leave a comment