A magistrate has ruled Nirbhay Chand not guilty of unlawful cultivation of illicit drugs, concluding that the prosecution did not meet the burden of proof required. The verdict was delivered by Magistrate Namrata Mishra on April 28, after examining the evidence surrounding the allegations against Mr. Chand, who was accused of cultivating 80 marijuana plants at his property on September 30, 2019.
During the trial, it became evident that the police faced challenges in substantiating their claims. The court noted inconsistencies regarding the evidence related to the number of plants taken for analysis and whether the creek from which the plants were discovered was private property or publicly accessible land. Magistrate Mishra highlighted that the prosecution failed to clarify critical facts with its witnesses, which ultimately influenced the court’s decision.
This case aligns with ongoing discussions in Fiji about the challenges of drug-related offenses and the judicial system’s navigation through such complexities. Recent similar cases, like that of Kiniviliame Nacagilevu, underscore a growing concern regarding illegal drug cultivation and its impact on the community. In Nacagilevu’s situation, although the court acknowledged the severity of drug cultivation, it opted for rehabilitation over punitive measures, demonstrating an emphasis on second chances and pathways to reform.
The verdict for Mr. Chand reflects the importance of due process and the necessity for the prosecution to present strong evidence in drug-related cases. As drug enforcement remains a pressing issue in Fiji, the judicial system’s approach may foster a more rehabilitative environment for individuals caught in the cycle of drug-related offenses, ultimately contributing to safer communities.
The outcome of this case serves as a reminder that not every allegation results in conviction and that fair legal proceedings uphold justice in the face of drug cultivation accusations.

Leave a comment