Hundreds of staff and students at the University of the South Pacific participated in a strike to protest what they describe as ongoing poor leadership at the institution.
The Association of the USP Staff and the USP Staff Union voiced their frustration following the recent outcomes of a Special Council meeting, which they believe incorrectly categorized serious grievances as simple HR matters requiring further investigation, rather than addressing the behavior of Vice Chancellor Pal Ahluwalia.
Participants in the strike arrived dressed in black and white, demonstrating their solidarity. This action was prompted by the results of a secret ballot held in August, which indicated a desire for the removal of Vice Chancellor Ahluwalia.
Rosie Fatiaki, President of the Association of the USP Staff, expressed disappointment with the responses from the Special Council Meeting, stating, “Collectively, the members of the USP Staff and the Union unanimously agreed to go on strike today. We hope the Council resolves this matter.”
Fatiaki emphasized that the unions stand firm in their belief that Vice Chancellor Ahluwalia must be removed, claiming that no credible investigation can take place while he retains his position within the university.
The unions criticized the continuation of Ahluwalia’s leadership in light of an ongoing investigation into his management, deeming it indicative of poor governance. Fatiaki noted that despite nearly four weeks since the last Council meeting, there has been no advancement in initiating the investigation.
The unions have long complained about Ahluwalia’s governance, highlighting concerns that were outlined in an independent report on his performance submitted to the Council in November of the previous year.
Despite patiently awaiting action from the Special Council, the unions find the latest communications from the Secretariat to be vague and unreflective of the fundamental issue—Ahluwalia’s failing leadership.
Fatiaki stated, “Strike is an industrial action, and we followed the necessary processes. We received a mandate to take strike action, and today nearly 200 staff participated.”
The unions find the delays unacceptable, especially given the agreement that the investigation’s findings would be presented at the November 2024 Council meeting. They argue that the protracted timeline suggests that the process is being intentionally hindered.
In response, the University acknowledged that Fiji-based members of the two unions have chosen to strike, asserting that the issues at hand fall outside the parameters of their collective contracts and employment conditions. The University reaffirmed that their primary focus remains on supporting students during this period.