Former Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has clarified that a conversation he had with the suspended Director of Public Prosecutions, Christopher Pryde, did not pertain to any ongoing investigations by the Criminal Investigations Department against him. While testifying in court, Sayed-Khaiyum described their discussion as a personal one concerning their children, specifically referring to Pryde’s daughter, Emma, and his own son, Ibrahim.
Sayed-Khaiyum contested the suggestion that the length of their conversation implied improper conduct, arguing that he had been engaging with several guests at the time, including ambassadors from the United States and Japan, and various Members of Parliament. He criticized a photograph submitted as evidence by Minister for Justice Siromi Turaga for presenting a misleading portrayal of the interaction with Pryde, stating that it was an isolated close-up image that did not capture the broader context or the other guests present.
Addressing inquiries about the nature of their conversation, Sayed-Khaiyum firmly denied any discussion related to his legal case, expressing his discontent with any assumptions to the contrary. He emphasized both his and Pryde’s commitment to ethical behavior and independence.
The court proceedings also touched upon allegations regarding the payment of superannuation to Pryde without proper approvals. Sayed-Khaiyum indicated that this issue falls under the purview of the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) and asserted that he played a limited role in the determination of such payments. Additionally, he noted that tracking payments to all Constitutional Office Holders, including Pryde, was not within his immediate recollection.
Sayed-Khaiyum further pointed out that similar concerns could be raised against the Minister for Justice, who was reportedly seen socializing with individuals under investigation. He mentioned that he had lodged a complaint with the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) regarding the conduct of certain DPP staff and stated that FICAC is currently looking into these complaints.
The tribunal, tasked with reviewing the allegations of misconduct against Pryde, is expected to make recommendations to the President regarding potential removal from his position.
This case highlights the intricate interplay between legal processes and ethical responsibilities within government offices and underscores the importance of maintaining transparency and accountability in public service.
The proceedings are set to continue tomorrow at 10 AM, with the judiciary observing closely as the situation develops. Overall, it reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law and the standards expected from individuals in positions of authority while addressing the concerns of the public.
Leave a comment